Ten years after the storm, we know New Orleans is changing, growing with new people and with those who lived here once and continue to come home.
There is a great sense of progress post-Katrina, but is that progress taking a little bit away from what makes our neighborhoods unique? What makes our city so special that the whole world wants to come and visit?
Today we talked about part of that progress - gentrification. What is it? How does it impact neighborhoods and those who have lived in one place for decades? Are they being priced out?
And those who have just arrived - will they change the culture of the neighborhood and is that a bad thing?
We have talked a lot here about the changes happening in some neighborhoods with home prices and rents that have skyrocketed. Is gentrification a dirty word or is it the salvation of declining places?
To help understand this complex topic I invited City Councilwoman LaToya Cantrell and the Chair of the Department of Urban Planning and Urban Studies at UNO, Dr. Renia Ehrenfeucht.
Dr. Renia Ehrenfeucht said that gentrification is hard to define but the most obvious signs are "changing real estate prices, rents, property values and incomes of people living in neighborhoods. Unfortunately, more often, people come in with higher incomes but that doesn't mean people that have lived there have more resources, better jobs and more money. Many of our poor neighborhoods suffered through periods of disinvestment as a result of former housing policies that privileged suburbanization, and some neighborhoods were ignored while others received a lot of investment. And now people are moving back and starting this process of neighborhood change."
She continued "Although gentrifiers can be white, African-American, Asian-American, in many cases what we are seeing is formerly African-American neighborhoods having many more white residents coming in. That's where we start asking these questions about who is benefitting, is someone going to be harmed or displaced because of that, is the culture of the neighborhood going to change?"
But if our neighborhoods are more integrated, isn't that a good thing? Don't we want that?
"Of course we do," said Councilwoman Cantrell. "That is the fabric of the city of New Orleans, not only our neighborhoods but the diversity of them. As we revelop them - and I really believe there is a difference between gentrification and redevelopment - when we are reveloping them, we are transforming them for everyone, not pricing people out but building the community with the same values and assets that are present."
It's a fascinating and important conversation for our city; you can hear the rest of it by clicking the link below.
Ronal Serpas was named Chief of New Orleans Police in 2010. His vision--to modernize the department, to accomplish the mandates of the federal consent decree and to build up his force of 1,540 officers.
Serpas was gone in four years…his force down to around 1,100…crime on the way up…and questions about who really was in charge of the NOPD.
An investigative report by WWL-TV’s Michael Pearlstein raises an even bigger question--was NOPD’s manpower crisis created by the police department or politicians who govern it? Then, the follow-up--is the question really that simple, or do circumstances get in the way?
Emails retrieved from Perlstein through public records requests reveal former NOPD Superintendent Ronal Serpas warned that the NOPD would become an almost entirely “reactive” police department. Serpas warned the city about personnel shortages in the sex crimes unit, slower response times and inadequate French Quarter patrols, due to budget cuts. At risk-- public safety, integrity and transparency.
Did warnings fall on deaf ears, or did the sins of the past administration…a budget crisis… prevent this administration from acting on Serpas’ calls to action?
We went in-depth about this issue with: Raphael Goyeneche (President, Metropolitan Crime Commission), Captain Michael Glasser (President, Police Association of New Orleans); Attorney Donovan Livaccari (Fraternal Order of Police) …Michael Perlstein (investigative reporter, WWL-TV) and Mayor Mitch Landrieu.
The battle between the City of New Orleans and the fire fighters union is heating up.
After four options to salvage the firefighters’ pension were rejected by the New Orleans Firefighters Association and retirement system representatives…word is the city will go the route of the legislature and courts.
None of this is easy. It’s been a battle with twists and turns involving millions of dollars. And, still there are crucial questions.
Has the city not paid into the system as it was supposed to?
Is the pension fund in such a sorry state because of bad investments and too generous benefits over decades?
The answer to both those questions is yes.
But, the issue is not who is right or wrong, but how both sides can do the right thing to fix a pension system that cannot be sustained.
This is not an intellectual debate just affecting firefighters and the mayor. It is important to all of us who pay taxes. This is about our money…lots of it.
Unfortunately, this may be a case where no one is a winner.
This is not an intellectual debate just affecting firefighters and the mayor. It affects us systemically & emotionally. It challenges our trust. As New Orleans faces a police shortage & public safety challenges, the last thing we need is tension with other vital civil servants.
It is also about money…our money…lots of it. This is important to all of us who pay taxes.
To hear Angela's conversation with Firefighters Union President Nick Felton, click the link below
Have you ever been driving down a street in New Orleans when a person on a bike crosses lanes right in front of you - no signal, no warning - just making a turn as if they owned the whole street?
Or have you ever been on a bike in your marked bike lane, when a car comes whizzing by you at high speed and comes within inches of hitting you - as if you're not even there?
Both these scenarios play out in the Crescent City all too often.
There are many more people using the road on bikes since Katrina and there has been a concerted effor by the city to make the roads safer for them. But cyclists often say motorists don't honor their space, and motorists say often say cyclists don't follow the law.
Cars and bikes must co-exist on the road but there are plenty of issues to sort out. Some drivers just don't want to share the road, and some of our old streets just aren't very wide anyway. But I have myself observed cyclists not obeying the simplest of laws, like riding the wrong direction or blowing through stop signs.
The solution is in educating all the users of the road in regard to the laws on the books and making sure that people - all people - are following the rules.
Joining me in studio today to discuss these matters were Dan Farve, the recently anointed Executive Director of Bike Easy, a bicycle advocacy group, Dan Jatres from the New Orleans Regional Planning Commission and bicycle accident attorney Charlie Thomas.
I asked - what is the temptation for cyclists to ride against traffic? Does that make them feel safer?
"It feels safer to see the car, but that really is just a perception. You're truly putting yourself in an unexpected location when you ride against traffic, so you're making yourself harder to see to the people driving cars on that road," Mr. Jatres told me.
"The highest percentage of wrecks are occuring with riders going against traffic - you're much more safe riding with traffic than against it," Mr. Thomas chimed in.
We took a call from a listener early on and I think a lot of people wonder this: what studies are done to determine where bike lanes get put in?
"Ultimately, those decisions are made by the City's Department of Public Works - the bike lane is the most visible change, so most people conclude that it was done just for the bike lane, but there are a whole variety of factors that go into it. On Esplanade, for example, there are a lot of different land uses that create an environment where people are riding, driving and walking. The decision was - how do you make this street safer and easier to use for everyone, not just bikes. The change was made for the betterment of all users on that road," Mr. Jatres continued.
To listen to the rest of the interview and make sure you have the facts no matter how you get around, click the link below.
He is working hard as the House Majority Whip and the third highest ranking Congressional leader. Steve Scalise's job in Washington is part diplomat and part cajoler with maybe a touch of arm twisting, but the goal is always the same - to get the GOP platform moving forward.
He was a special guest several months ago and today he is back with an update. Here's a few imporant highlights for you but as always we have made the full interview available as a podcast, and you can just click the link at the bottom of this blog to hear it.
Is fulfilling your job as Majroity Whip harder than you thought it would be?
"There are many complications to it... especially since we've got the largest House majority on the Republican side since the 1930's. So in some cases you might think its easy to get 218 votes when you have 245 Republicans, but in many ways it is more complicated... everybody thinks they are a free agent so getting to 218 is sometimes a challenge but we've been able to do it on some really important legislation, including this budget which we just finished up out of the House a few weeks ago.
What are your thoughts on Iran?
"When you look at Iran and their intentions, they not only want to get a nuclear weapon but what do they want to use it for? They've made it very clear that they want to eviscerate Israel from the face of the Earth... this is a sworn enemy of the United States and our strongest ally in that region in Israel. I think the President went the wrong way, because this deal does not require Iran to get rid of their nuclear weapons program. They get to keep over 6,000 centrifuges to enrich uranium, and even the President acknowledged yesterday, if Iran abided by every term of this deal, they'd be less than a year away at its expiration from developing a nuclear weapon. Not only is that bad for America and Israel, it would start a nuclear arms race in the Middle East and that's the last thing we want to see happen."
How about Obamacare?
"You see costs going up, you see access being more limited. In our budget we call for the repeal of Obamacare... we're expecting by June that the Supreme Court will announce a decision on it. If they go the right way and say the President can't do what he's doing, it will blow a major hole in the President's health care law, and what we've done is begun working to come up with an alternative to solve this problem using free market approaches, like letting patients decide their own healthcare and not having governement beaurocrats in Washington say you can't buy this, you have to buy that."
It was an enlightening interview with a powerful man in Washington. Click the link below to hear the rest!
Do you know what the budget for the Louisiana Department of Corrections is?
Between $600 and $700 million dollars every year. And that figure only includes state prisons - it does not account for local jails, or courts or police. Just state prisons. $700 million. That's $150 million more dollars than we spend on the entire LSU system.
The news right now is full of headlines about draconian cuts to higher education, and to learn that we spend more on state prisons than state universities is disturbing.
So as we are looking at ways to fill a $1.6 billion dollar deficit, some have suggested that we look for savings in the Department of Corrections, and closely inspect the amount of money Louisiana spends every year on elderly and sick state prisoners. There are thousands of them, and their shelter and medical costs add up quickly.
One person suggesting that we might be able to alleviate some of our budget woes by reform this system is Marjorie Esman, Executive Director of the ACLU. She joined me on "An Open Mind" today to discuss her idea, and she was joined by none other than Angola warden Burl Cain, who so happens to be the longest-serving warden in the entire United States.
I had looked at some studies that showed prisoners older than 55 are generally no longer a threat to society. So I asked Mr. Cain - does that comport with reality?
"That's true," he said. "Because you're getting too old and you're just not going to be doing the crimes you did when you were young. Many times, by then, you've settled down and your life has changed and that's just not what you do anymore. There are always a few exceptions, but they are very very few."
"Once prisoners reach 55 years old, the recidivism rate drops to about one percent," Esman chimed in. "That's essentially nothing. What we're doing is locking people up forever - incarcerating them until they die - when we know that for entire decades, they are not likely to do any harm."
It's a fascinating conversation about a very important problem we are facing in this state. We talked at length about what other states are doing, what the resistance is to sentencing reform, other areas we can cut back, and more. I even asked Warden Cain about talk that he might be interested in running for Governor. You can listen to the entire interview by clicking the link below.
Ben Watson has spent 11 years in the NFL, winning two Super Bowl rings with the Patriots, then playing with the Cleveland Browns before putting on #82 for the New Orleans Saints. But there is so much more to Ben than just being a tight end.
Shortly after the NFL Ray Rice controversy, I heard Ben speak at a domestic violence event, saying loudly and clearly that any kind of abuse is unacceptable. And within 24 hours of the Ferguson grand jury resolution, Ben wrote his thoughts on Facebook, and they quickly went viral, elevating his status as a serious thinker and a spiritual learner.
Ben is a veteran football player but he is also a very proud husband and father of four (soon to be five!) children, and perhaps most importantly, he is a man of God, and that is the message in all that he does.
Ben was our guest on "An Open Mind" this afternoon and I know you're going to love hearing what he has to say, not just about football and the Saints, but about race, family and spirituality in 21st century America.
To hear my full interview with Mr. Watson, click the link below.
As the Saints make whirlwind trades and acquisitions preparing for a new season of football behind the scenes... the back and forth legal maneuvers splashed across TV, radio and dot-coms continue. The billion dollar question--who will ultimately own the teams?
Three psychiatrists completed their examinations of Tom Benson. Will they find him competent to decide who he leaves his empire to? Or, will they reveal that the patriarch of New Orleans’ first family could have been manipulated to change his mind leaving the Saints to his wife… not his daughter and grandchildren?
Tom Benson has only been seen publicly once since he sent his daughter Renee and grandchildren, Rita and Ryan a letter cutting them out of his life saying they would be financially taken care of, but would not be part of any of his business holdings, including the Saints and Pelicans.
That letter started the legal gamesmanship that we Saints fans are watching with both fascination and concern.
But one man, who had access to Tom Benson for almost a week, is New York Times journalist Ken Belson. He’s a sports reporter who writes about the business of sports. Belson recently filed a report about what’s happening off the field.
At 3pm today, Ken Belson was our guest with attorney & legal analyst Tim Meche. Our hope was to gain insights into the psyche of Tom Benson as he & his family are locked in an inheritance dispute. And, to get a greater understanding about what the latest legal moves mean in what may be the saddest game in Saints history.
New Orleans has a very high rate of people who rent rather than buy homes... but how many of those rental units are substandard apartments? We all know that rents have skyrocketed in the last ten years, but the quality and conditions of those properties have not even come close to keeping pace. What's the answer?
New Orleans City Councilman Jason Williams believes that renters need protection from landlords, some of them 'slumlords,' who don't hold up their end of the bargain. He and Councilwoman LaToya Cantrell want to create a rental registry to make sure that rental properties are registered and regularly inspected to meet minimum standards.
"To put it simply, a rental registry is a way of certifying that all of our rental stock in this city meets certain minimum standards of qulaity, health, having working smoke detectors, proper plumbing and electrical. We're not talking about making it fancy, just about the basic needs that should be met as part of our existing code."
What percent of our rental stock is not meeting that standard? How big of a problem is this in New Orleans?
"When you lok at other cities, one intersting thing is that they dont have as large of a rental population as we do. We have over 50% of our citizens renting homes. By the very nature of that volume, we have more folks who are landlords who are not meeting minimum standards. Since 2005, Prices have gone up and standards in which people are living have stayed the same, and thats affecting our quality of life."
So what does that mean for the city as a whole?
"We talk a lot about crime, about young people involed in crime, but just focusing on that one criminal act and not looking the quality of life issues that are causing that person to commit a crime is like focusing on the headache and not focusing on the brain tumor... we've got to start addressing our povery issue in New Orleans, and this rental registry is the begninng of that."
Did you get a number of calls from people saying "I live in a dump and my landlord wont help me?"
"That's part of it, but the other part of it is just keeping pace with protections of citizens in the rest of the country. A lot of cities are putting this in place to ensure their renters have a certain standard quality of housing, and we need to do that too."
To hear the full conversation with Councilman Williams and a Q&A session with our listeners, click the link below.
Welfare in America didn’t start with Lyndon Johnson and his vision of a great society. It started when President Franklin Roosevelt psigned the Social Security Act in 1935 during the desperate time of the Great Depression. At that time, one out of four Americans had lost their job, some families ended up living in parks and millions of children suffered from a lack of nutrition.
Tacked into the Social Security Act was a Federal national welfare system… one that FDR didn’t think would last long, as the Depression diminished and people went back to work. He even expressed his concern for the long-term effects of welfare. President Roosevelt expressed that concern a speech before Congress…
“The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit.”
President Roosevelt got the nation through a painful crisis, but his hope of less need for welfare was never realized. According to the Heritage Foundation, over 100 million Americans are on some form of welfare. The tab: one trillion dollars and growing.
What can be done to stem that growth? What can be done to make the system more efficient for those in real need? And, how can we weed out those abusing welfare programs? The House Ways and Means Human Resources Subcommittee is looking at all of these questions.
So today we’re talking about true welfare reform in America with a man in a position to do something about it… the man who will be leading the charge, Louisiana Congressman and Chairman of the House Ways and Means Human Resources Subcommittee Charles Boustany of Lafayette. That's today at 3pm and we hope you join us.